Memorysclub / NCERT Solutions / NCERT Solutions for Class 12 / NCERT Solutions for Class 12 History / NCERT Solutions for Class 12 History Chapter 13 Mahatma Gandhi and the Nationalist Movement Civil Disobedience and Beyond

Class 12 History Chapter 13 Mahatma Gandhi and the Nationalist Movement Civil Disobedience and Beyond

1. How did Mahatma Gandhi seek to identify with the common people?

Answer 1

You have provided several accurate points that highlight how Mahatma Gandhi sought to identify with the common people. Here is a further elaboration on each point:

(a) Simple Lifestyle: Gandhi consciously chose to adopt a simple lifestyle to connect with the common people. He dressed in traditional Indian clothing such as a loincloth (dhoti) and a shawl (shawl) instead of Western attire. By doing so, he shed the symbols of privilege and wealth, opting for attire that reflected the simplicity of the masses.

(b) Language of the People: Gandhi made an effort to communicate with the people in their own language. He spoke in the vernacular languages spoken by the local population, which allowed him to connect with them on a deeper level. By using their language, he demonstrated respect for their culture and made his message more accessible to the masses.

(c) Opposition to Caste System and Untouchability: Gandhi vehemently opposed the caste system and worked towards eradicating untouchability. He believed in the equality of all individuals, regardless of their caste or social background. He personally interacted with and lived amongst the Harijans (people considered untouchable), challenging discriminatory practices and promoting social harmony.

(d) Dignity of Labor: Gandhi attached great importance to labour and physical work. He believed that all forms of work were honourable and dignified. He actively engaged in manual labour himself, spinning cotton on a charkha (spinning wheel) and even cleaning toilets. By valuing and participating in physical work, he sought to break down the barriers between different occupations and promote equality.

(e) Challenging Social Hierarchies: Gandhi was a vocal critic of the hierarchical divisions within society. He advocated for a society that did not classify people based on their social status, wealth, or occupation. He promoted the idea of everyone being equal and deserving of respect, regardless of their position in society. His stance aimed to eliminate the notion of high and low status, emphasizing the inherent worth and dignity of every individual.

Through these actions, Gandhi demonstrated his commitment to identifying with the common people and championing their causes. His efforts to simplify his lifestyle, communicate in their language, challenge social inequalities, and engage in manual labour helped him forge a deep connection with the masses, making him a revered leader and inspiration for generations to come.

2. How was Mahatma Gandhi perceived by the peasants?

Answer 2

The peasants saw Mahatma Gandhi as a figure sent by the King to resolve their issues and override local officials. They believed in his power surpassing that of the English monarch, with hopes that his arrival would lead to the departure of colonial rulers. Gandhi was regarded as a saviour who would rescue them from high taxes and oppressive officials, restoring dignity and autonomy to their lives. His ascetic lifestyle, use of traditional clothing like the dhoti, and association with the charkha further enhanced his appeal among the peasants.

3. Why did the salt laws become an important issue of struggle?

Answer 3

The salt laws imposed by the British government indeed had a significant impact on the poorest segments of Indian society. 

Here are some key points regarding the salt laws:

Monopoly and Price Increase: The salt laws established a monopoly on salt production and distribution, granting exclusive rights to the British government. This resulted in a controlled market where prices could be artificially inflated. The combination of monopoly control and government-imposed taxes on salt made it a burden for the impoverished Indian population, who heavily relied on salt as a prime ingredient in their food.

Restricted Access to Natural Salt: The salt laws restricted people’s access to natural sources of salt, such as salt pans or salt mines. These natural salt deposits were either taken over by the British government or destroyed, further limiting the availability of salt for the local population. This forced people to rely on the salt produced by government-backed monopolies, leading to increased prices.

Impact on Local Industry: The salt laws also had a negative impact on local industries, particularly in rural villages. Traditional methods of salt production, such as extracting salt from seawater or manufacturing it locally, were suppressed or banned. This not only affected the livelihoods of those involved in the salt industry but also disrupted the local economy and led to increased dependence on government-controlled salt.

Unpopularity and Significance in the Struggle: The salt laws were highly unpopular among the Indian population, especially the poorest sections who bore the brunt of the burden. The oppressive nature of these laws and their impact on everyday life made them a significant focal point of the Indian independence struggle. The movement against the salt laws gained prominence during Mahatma Gandhi’s Salt March in 1930, which played a crucial role in mobilizing the masses and raising awareness about the broader struggle for independence.

Overall, the salt laws implemented by the British government in India had far-reaching consequences on the poorest individuals and communities, contributing to their economic hardships and fueling discontent and resistance against colonial rule.

5. Why was the charkha chosen as a symbol of nationalism?

Answer 5

The charkha, or spinning wheel, was chosen as a symbol of nationalism for several reasons during the Indian Freedom Movement:

Economic Self-Sufficiency: The charkha represented the idea of economic self-sufficiency and self-reliance. Mahatma Gandhi advocated for the revival of cottage industries and encouraged Indians to spin their own cloth using the charkha. By promoting the production of handspun khadi cloth, Gandhi aimed to reduce dependence on imported British textiles and promote indigenous industries. The charkha symbolized the vision of an economically independent India.

Empowerment of Rural Population: The charkha was seen as a means to empower the rural population, particularly the impoverished farmers and villagers. Gandhi believed that by engaging in spinning, individuals could earn a livelihood, develop skills, and uplift their economic conditions. The charkha was viewed as a tool to alleviate poverty, promote rural development, and empower the masses.

Nonviolence and Noncooperation: The charkha aligned with the principles of nonviolence and noncooperation, which were central to Gandhi’s philosophy of resistance. Spinning on the charkha was seen as an act of peaceful protest and a form of noncooperation with British rule. It represented the idea that Indians could resist British oppression through nonviolent means, such as boycotting British goods and embracing indigenous practices.

Symbol of Simplicity and Swadeshi: The charkha embodied the spirit of simplicity and Swadeshi (Indian-made products). Gandhi advocated for a lifestyle focused on simplicity, rejecting excessive materialism and embracing traditional Indian values. The charkha represented this ethos of simplicity and the promotion of Indian-made goods over imported ones. It became a symbol of national pride and cultural identity.

Unity and Equality: The charkha transcended social and economic divisions, symbolizing unity and equality. People from various backgrounds, irrespective of caste, religion, or gender, could participate in spinning on the charkha. It promoted inclusivity and solidarity among Indians, emphasizing the idea of a united front against colonial rule.

In summary, the charkha was chosen as a symbol of nationalism during the Indian Freedom Movement because it represented economic self-sufficiency, empowerment of the rural population, nonviolence and noncooperation, simplicity and Swadeshi, and unity and equality. It became a powerful visual and ideological symbol that encapsulated the aspirations and values of the movement for independence from British rule.

6. How was non-cooperation a form of protest?

Answer 6

You are absolutely correct. Non-cooperation during the Indian Freedom Movement was indeed a form of protest against British rule. Here’s how the points you mentioned illustrate this:

Hindu-Muslim Unity: The non-cooperation movement witnessed a remarkable level of unity between Hindus and Muslims, particularly during the Khilafat movement. This unity in protesting against British rule demonstrated the shared grievances and aspirations of the Indian people. The collaboration between different communities showed a collective front against the British, challenging their divide-and-rule tactics and fostering a spirit of solidarity.

Boycott of British Institutions: One of the key aspects of the non-cooperation movement was the boycott of British institutions and symbols of colonial rule. People actively participated in boycotting courts, colleges, and government offices, symbolically rejecting the legitimacy of British authority. This act of non-cooperation disrupted the functioning of these institutions and conveyed a strong message of resistance. The establishment of alternative institutions, such as Jamia Millia Islamia, provided an indigenous platform for education and self-governance.

Tax Boycott: Another significant aspect of non-cooperation was the refusal to pay taxes to the British government. By boycotting tax collection, individuals and communities directly challenged the financial foundation of the colonial administration. This non-cooperation with tax collection demonstrated a collective refusal to contribute to the maintenance of British rule and reflected the popular discontent with their oppressive policies.

These acts of non-cooperation, including the boycott of British institutions and tax collection, were clear forms of protest against British rule. They aimed to weaken the British empire by withdrawing support, challenging its authority, and demonstrating the collective will of the Indian people. The non-cooperation movement served as a powerful tool for expressing grievances, fostering unity, and mobilizing mass participation in the struggle for independence.

7. Why were the dialogues at the Round Table Conference inconclusive?

Answer 7

The information you provided highlights some of the key reasons for the inconclusive nature and failure of the Round Table Conferences. 

Absence of Indian National Congress: The absence of the Indian National Congress, the largest and most influential political party representing the Indian nationalist movement, during the First Round Table Conference, weakened the overall representation and undermined the legitimacy of the discussions. The Congress leaders were imprisoned due to their participation in the civil disobedience movement, which hindered their involvement in the conferences and deprived them of an opportunity to directly negotiate with the British government.

Gandhi-Irwin Pact: The Second Round Table Conference saw the participation of Mahatma Gandhi after his release from prison. The signing of the Gandhi-Irwin Pact led to the partial withdrawal of the salt laws, but it did not address the broader demand for complete independence. The agreement came under criticism as it fell short of the Congress’s aspirations and failed to provide a clear path towards self-rule.

Divisive Politics and Lack of Consensus: The Third Round Table Conference faced significant challenges in achieving consensus among the participants. The Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, claimed to be the sole representative of Muslims in India and advocated for separate electorates and the creation of Pakistan. Dr B.R. Ambedkar, representing the interests of the lower castes, also sought separate electorates and reservations for the Dalits. The native rulers, known as princes or maharajas, asserted their independent stance and resisted the Congress’s influence. These divisions and conflicting demands hindered the formulation of a unified approach towards constitutional reforms.

Princely States’ Attitude: The princely states, which enjoyed varying degrees of autonomy under British suzerainty, expressed their intention to deal with the British government independently rather than through Congress. Their reluctance to align with Congress’s demands and their desire to safeguard their own interests further complicated the negotiations and undermined the prospects of a unified approach towards self-rule.

In conclusion, the divisive politics of the Muslim League and Dr Ambedkar, along with the attitude of the princely states, were significant reasons for the failure of the Round Table Conferences. The absence of Congress in the early conferences and the limitations of the agreements reached during the later conferences also contributed to the inconclusive outcomes. These factors reflected the challenges and complexities in achieving consensus among the various stakeholders involved in the discussions on India’s constitutional reforms and path towards self-rule

8. In what way did Mahatma Gandhi transform the nature of the national movement?

Answer 8

some significant points regarding Mahatma Gandhi’s role in transforming the nature of the Indian freedom movement. Here’s an elaboration of those points:

Inclusivity of the Freedom Movement: Mahatma Gandhi played a crucial role in expanding participation in the freedom movement beyond the educated middle class. He actively sought to involve people from all walks of life, including villagers, farmers, labourers, workers, and students. By mobilizing the masses and making the movement more accessible to the common people, Gandhi brought a new level of inclusivity to the struggle for independence. However, it is worth noting that some critics argue that Gandhi’s use of religious symbols to mobilize the masses may have inadvertently contributed to the rise of communal politics in the long run.

Emancipation of Women: Gandhi’s influence extended to the emancipation of women and their participation in public life. The freedom movement provided a platform for women to actively engage in political activities, including picketing against shops selling foreign goods as part of the non-cooperation movement. Prominent women leaders like Sarojini Naidu and Rajkumari Amrit Kaur emerged during this period, making significant contributions to the struggle for independence. Gandhi’s emphasis on women’s empowerment helped break traditional barriers and brought about a new era of female participation in Indian society.

Social Reforms: For Mahatma Gandhi, the freedom movement was not only about political independence but also about social reform. He advocated for the upliftment of the oppressed and marginalized sections of society, particularly the depressed classes (now known as Dalits). Gandhi spoke against the practice of untouchability and worked towards eradicating this social evil from Indian society. His political philosophy encompassed the goal of ending untouchability and promoting social equality, making it an integral part of the larger freedom movement.

By making the freedom movement a mass movement, involving people from all sections of society, and addressing social issues alongside political objectives, Mahatma Gandhi transformed the nature of the Indian freedom struggle. His emphasis on inclusivity, women’s empowerment, and social reform brought about significant changes and laid the foundation for a more comprehensive and holistic approach to the fight for independence.

9. What do private letters and autobiographies tell us about an individual? How are these sources different from official accounts?

Importance of autobiographies and letters as sources of information about the lives and views of individuals, particularly in the context of India’s freedom struggle. Here’s an elaboration on the points you have mentioned:

Revealing Interests and Views: Autobiographies and letters provide valuable insights into the interests and intellectual pursuits of individuals. For example, Jawaharlal Nehru’s letters to his daughter Indira Gandhi, compiled in the book “Glimpses of the World History,” showcase his interest in world history. These writings not only shed light on the personal interests of the authors but also reflect their views on various subjects. Nehru’s praise for the socialist government of the USSR in his autobiography highlights his political inclinations and perspectives.

Social Life of the Era: Autobiographies and letters offer glimpses into the social life and cultural milieu of the time. Dr. Rajendra Prasad’s detailed descriptions of village life in his childhood village provide valuable insights into the social fabric and traditions prevalent during that period. These accounts help paint a broader picture of the society in which these leaders lived and the influences that shaped their perspectives.

Historical Significance: Autobiographies and letters serve as valuable historical sources, providing firsthand accounts of significant events and experiences. Nehru’s autobiography, for instance, offers detailed explanations of the obstinate approach of the Muslim League in addressing the minority problem in India. These personal narratives provide unique perspectives and deeper insights into historical events and their impact on the individuals involved.

Regarding the differences between official accounts and personal writings:

Independence from Government Guidelines: Official accounts are often constrained by the guidelines and agendas set by the government, limiting the freedom of expression and preventing the exploration of divergent views. In contrast, autobiographies and letters allow individuals to express their personal interests and opinions without the constraints imposed by official guidelines. This enables a more personal and independent perspective on various subjects.

Personal Life and Experiences: Autobiographies and letters provide glimpses into the personal lives of the leaders, revealing formative experiences and events that shaped their thinking and ideologies. Mahatma Gandhi’s account of being thrown out of a first-class compartment in South Africa and his subsequent journey towards non-violent protest showcases the transformative moments that influenced his approach to activism.

In summary, autobiographies and letters serve as valuable sources of information, offering insights into the interests, views, social life, and historical experiences of individuals. They provide a more personal and independent perspective compared to official accounts, enabling a deeper understanding of the lives and contributions of freedom struggle leaders in India. 

Class 12 History Next Chapter